Both Kroger and Albertsons have asked a California court to keep certain expert testimony about their failed merger sealed in ...

On May 21, 2025, the Federal Circuit en banc banished the notion that the reliability of an expert’s methodology under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 (“Rule 702”) is a question of weight, not ...

The Brendan Banfield murder trial entered a critical new phase as the defense formally began presenting its case in Fairfax ...

Could the foundation of a high-profile conviction crumble under scrutiny of its expert testimony? Former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin, serving concurrent federal and state sentences for ...

Expert witnesses play a vital role in the legal system by providing impartial testimony that helps judges and jurors understand the key issues and make sound decisions. Photo courtesy of Freepik.

ABDUL-MALIK WAS ARRESTED NEARBY. NEW. AT SIX, A JUDGE ISSUES A KEY RULING ON WHAT JURORS WILL HEAR FROM DEFENSE EXPERTS AT THE TRIAL FOR ONE OF THREE MEN ACCUSED OF KILLING CRYSTAL ROGERS. BROOKS ...

To support his claim, Plaintiff relied on a board-certified oncologist who conducted a “differential etiology”—an established scientific technique for determining the cause of a medical condition by ...

Bonnie Baker updates her previous article which discussed the Supreme Court’s decision in Diaz v. the United States. In that article, she discussed how Diaz had upended the interpretation of Federal ...

The Federal Rules of Evidence took effect in 1975. The rules include Article VII, devoted largely to the admissibility of expert-opinion testimony. Although expert testimony played a major role in ...

The Delaware Supreme Court has overturned a lower court’s decision that allowed expert testimony supporting plaintiffs’ claims in a high-profile case alleging that Zantac, or its generic ranitidine, ...

COLUMBUS, Ohio — After a 30-minute delay due to a fire drill, jurors in the trial of former Blendon Township police officer Connor Grubb heard from several expert witnesses Thursday as they consider ...

In Wolford v. Lopez, the Supreme Court has the opportunity to clarify for the lower courts the difference between legislative and adjudicative facts. Lower courts hostile to the Second Amendment ...