For effective long-range planning and continuous improvement, it is important to monitor the progress of a new degree program soon after implementation. All new academic degrees, options, and ...

A department or program review provides an occasion to re-examine learning goals and course offerings, identify programmatic strengths and weaknesses, envision the future shape of the curriculum, ...

Responsible management of academic programs depends on regular and consistent information made available to departments and colleges for the purposes of monitoring academic quality and resource ...

SUNY mandates program review on a five to seven year cycle for all credit-bearing academic programs which are not programmatically accredited. A self-study document is prepared by the department ...

“Academic program reviews” have become a standard best practice in higher education’s accountability world. Every five years or so, a department brings in outside professors to critique how well — or ...

The site visit consists of a set series of business days where two to three external evaluators visit campus and meet with department faculty and staff, graduate and undergraduate students (where ...

Cal Lutheran’s Program Review provides an opportunity for a recurring all-inclusive assessment of a program for its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and challenges, with the ultimate goal of ...

Regular, periodic reviews of academic degree programs provide a formal process for thorough, fact-based documentation and evaluation of the programs, the infrastructure supporting them, and the plans ...

Over the past year, the Program Performance Review Committee developed an Annual Program Review (APR) process that will be timelier and more meaningful, along with two complementary dashboards. The ...

WMU engages in an integrated program review process called for by the University Strategic Plan and as part of Higher Learning Commission compliance. Three types of reviews occur on a six-year cycle: ...