When the Supreme Court overturns rulings without offering any explanation, it is simply wielding raw power. And raw power ...

The nomination of Emil Bove III to a federal appeals court suggests that President Trump has a new prototype and a new agenda ...

The court has supported his administration on issues like immigration, federal employee dismissals and military policies.

Sittenfeld, in the post, said he's not interested in running for office but wants to protect people who run for office in the ...

With the Supreme Court’s decision in this case, yet another dagger is aimed at the very heart of the Constitution.

Rashida Tlaib, a left-wing Democrat from Detroit, scolded the Supreme Court for allowing President Donald Trump to proceed, ...

The Supreme Court should reject Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal of her sex-trafficking conviction, the ...

While the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority is pushing the law rightward, the justices appointed by GOP presidents ...

In a series of terse, unsigned orders, the court has often been giving the green light to President Trump’s agenda without a ...

She has become the great dissenter, sometimes siding with Justices Sonia Sotomayor or Elena Kagan or sometimes standing alone ...

In a precedent-based legal system, you can’t know what the law is if you don’t have judicial opinions explaining why the courts have reached their conclusions.

Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily.