The U.S. Supreme Court then ruled in 1967’s Garrity v. New Jersey that the employees’ statements, made under threat of termination, were compelled by the state in violation of the …

Do Garrity Rights apply if I'm investigated by an outside agency? If you are a public employee and are investigated by an outside agency, Garrity Rights can still apply if you are clearly subject to …

If you refuse to answer my questions, you will be subject to immediate dismissal. When such an advisory statement is not put forth by the employer, employees can utilize a “Garrity …

Garrity Basics contains what you need to know in order to understand Garrity Rights. Read about the original Garrity case, and find a clear, concise description of these important protections.

Obviously, this is the case that gives "Garrity Rights" their name. This case and its progeny have become a critical part of public sector labor relations, particularly in law enforcement.

Case Summaries United States Supreme Court Garrity v. New Jersey, 385 U.S. 493 (1967). Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S. 511 (1967). Gardner v. Broderick, 392 U.S. 273 (1968). Uniformed …

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS You are hereby ordered to fully cooperate with the investigating official(s). Your failure to cooperate will create an objective and subjective fear of termination. …

Criminal vs. Administrative Investigations (‘Garrity’ Issues and Workplace Searches), Florida Department of Law Enforcement, 2000 (link to PDF download). Ryan, Jack.

Jun 16, 2011 · The Garrity Rights blog's discussion of *Lybarger v. City of Los Angeles* (1985) offers a compelling examination of a landmark case that continues to shape the rights of public …

A cursory review of the basic case law would have shown otherwise. Even the original Garrity decision in 1967 said the protection "extends to all, whether they are policemen or other …